Bible Prophecy For Today

March 23, 2009

The Tribulation By H.A. Ironside

harry
Those who attack dispensational truth tell us that the Great Tribulation is in the past.  They declare that the truth which we have been teaching people for years–that the Dispensation of Grace, now on the verge of closing, will be followed by the Great Tribulation–is all wrong.  They say that it is just a fantastic notion that is unsupported by Scripture.  Is the Tribulation in the past, or is it in the future?  Let us turn to God’s Word for the answer to this question.

First we must speak briefly of the seventy weeks of Daniel 9.  Having been familiar with these things for thirty-three years and having examined very carefully much that has been written contrary thereto, I am absolutely convinced that the seventieth week of Daniel is yet unfulfilled.  It is the only view that, to my mind, harmonizes with all the prophecies in Scripture.  It makes the Book of Revelation perfectly clear.  It explains the difficult things in the Book of Daniel and other prophetic books.

Until one sees the break between the sixty-ninth and the seventieth week, all is confusion.  The Great Tribulation is to occur in this seventieth week.  I want to show that this is clearly taught in the Word.

Those who teach that the Tribulation was in the past are divided into several distinct schools.  The Preterists maintain that the Great Tribulation took place at the time of the trouble which the Jewish people passed through when the Roman armies, under Titus, destroyed Jerusalem and wrought havoc throughout Palestine.  The Great Tribulation, according to them, began in A.D. 70 and ended a very short time afterward.  The Roman Catholic view which is ordinarily held refers to the two hundred or more years of persecution under pagan Rome, which ended with the church’s triumph over the paganism of the empire.

The other view, commonly known as the historical interpretation, holds that the Great Tribulation referred to the period of trial during which those who protested against the Romish dogmas were persecuted.

Those who are called Futurists maintain that the Great Tribulation has never yet taken place and cannot begin as long as the Church of God (born-again believers) is in the world.  It will not take place until we have been called to meet the Lord in the air. This is the view that I hold.

We shall now turn to some passages of Scripture and see whether or not it is logically possible to believe that the Great Tribulation is in the past.

In the opening verses of Jeremiah 30 we have a prophecy in regard to the restoration of Israel to the land of Palestine.  Scripture shows that they are restored, still in unbelief, to the land of Palestine.  Conviction and regeneration take place after the restoration to the land of Palestine, when the Church has been caught up.

In Jeremiah 30:3 we read:

“For, lo, the days come, saith the Lord, that I will bring again the captivity of my people Israel and Judah, saith the Lord: and I will cause them to return to the land that I gave to their fathers, and they shall possess it.”

This does not refer to the temporary return under Ezra and Nehemiah.  “They shall possess it” indicates that they will enter into possession of the land, not to surrender it again to any other people.

In verses 4-7 we have a description of the hour of trial that is coming upon the land.

“And these are the words that the Lord spake concerning Israel and concerning Judah.  For thus saith  the Lord; We have heard a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace.  Ask ye now, and see whether a man doth travail with child?  wherefore do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness?  Alas! for that day is great, so that none is like it: it is even  the time of Jacob’s trouble, but he shall be saved out of it.”

Observe that this is not the time of the Church’s trouble; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Church.  It is the time of Jacob’s trouble.  What must be the result?  That Jacob is scattered and broken and practically destroyed?  no, the very opposite!  He is saved out of it.  The Great Tribulation will end with the deliverance rather than the scattering of Israel.  That does not fit in at all with what took place in the land of Palestine in A.D. 70 and the years that followed.  Instead of being saved out of it, Jacob was scattered throughout the entire world as a result of it.

“For it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord of hosts, that I will break his yoke (the yoke of the Gentiles) from off thy neck, and will burst thy bonds, and strangers shall no more  serve themselves of him”  (Jer. 30:8).

They will no more make a servant of him, for he is the true son of David.

“Therefore fear thou not, O my servant Jacob, saith the Lord; neither be dismayed, O Israel: for, lo, I will save thee from afar, and thy seed from the land of their captivity; and Jacob shall return, and shall be in rest, and be quiet, and none shall make him afraid” (Jer. 30:10).

Daniel 11 gives us a very remarkable prophecy that reaches right down to the end of the Jewish dispensation, to the “time of the end,” which is a term used again and again.  We read of Israel’s sorrows and sufferings under the Antichrist.  There is a description of the Antichrist in Daniel 11:36-39:

“The king shall do according to his will; and he shall exalt himself, and magnify himself above every  god, and shall speak marvellous things against the God of gods, and shall prosper till the indignation  be accomplished.”

We read in Daniel 12:1:

“And at that time shall Michael stand up, the great prince which standeth for the children of thy people: and there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation even to that same time: and at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

Is it not true that there has never been a time of more dreadful suffering than that which Israel endured under Rome?  Read what Josephus says about the horror which the people of Israel endured in those days.  Many think that this might be the time referred to.  But notice the last part of the verse:

“And at that time thy people shall be delivered, every one that shall be found written in the book.”

They were not delivered at the time of the Roman persecution; instead, they were scattered everywhere throughout the world.  It is clear that this continues until the kingdom.

“And many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt” (Dan. 12:2).

Some do not think that this is the literal resurrection.  It may be the picture we have in the Book of Ezekiel of the dry bones of Israel springing into life, coming up from the dust of the earth (from being scattered among the Gentiles), some to everlasting life, and those who are apostate, to shame and everlasting contempt.

“They that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever” (Dan. 12:3).

To what time does this refer?

“But thou, O Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book, even to the time of the end: many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased” (Dan. 12:4).

One sign of the time of the end is that people will run to and fro throughout the world, and there will be an increase of knowledge.

Commenting on these words more than one hundred years ago, Sir Isaac Newton said, “Personally, I cannot but believe these words concerning the end of the times.  One sign of the end will be a remarkable increase in methods of getting about.  Men will travel from country to country in an unprecedented manner.  There may be some inventions which will enable people to travel much more quickly than they do now.”  Sir Isaac Newton believed it possible that, as the end drew near, somebody might invent a means of locomotion which would enable people to travel at the astonishing rate of fifteen or twenty miles an hour.

Voltaire said, “See what a fool Christianity makes of an otherwise brilliant man.  Here a scientist like Newton actually writes that men may travel at the rate of fifteen or twenty miles an hour.  Has he forgotten that if a man would travel at the rate of fifteen miles an hour, he would be suffocated?  His heart would stand still.”  It was not long until man traveled at the speed considered fatal by Voltaire.  He survived.  Now men travel at astonishing speeds.

The last part of Zechariah, from chapter twelve to the end, seems to deal almost entirely with this period of great trouble.  In chapter 14 we read that Jerusalem itself will be affected.

“Behold, the day of the Lord cometh, and thy spoil shall be divided in the midst of thee.  For   I will gather all nations against Jerusalem to battle; and the city shall be taken, and the houses rifled, and the women ravished; and half of the city shall go forth into captivity, and the residue  of the people, shall not be cut off from the city.”

The Preterist interprets this by a system of accomodation, saying, “Were not the Roman armies the representatives of all nations, all fighting under the banner of Caesar?”  That is not what we have here.  Here we have the definite armies of all the nations of the world gathered together against Jerusalem in that last great effort.  When this takes place, “then shall the Lord go forth, and fight against those nations, as when he fought in the day of battle.”

Notice the order here–Jerusalem surrounded by the armies of the nations, a time of great distress and trouble, the people crying to God for help, and the Lord going forth to destroy the armies (we also see Him in battle in chapter 19 of Revelation) and coming down to earth.  “His feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives” (Zech. 14:4).  The Preterist tells us that this has already been fulfilled–that His feet stood on the Mount of Olives before He went up into heaven.  But here He descends at the close of this period of trouble, and His feet stand on the Mount of Olives.  What happens?  “And the Mount of Olives shall cleave in the midst thereof toward the east and toward the west, and there shall be a very great valley; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the north, and half of it toward the south.”

Some years ago there was a great earthquake in Palestine.  The Mount of Olives was badly shaken, and many buildings were leveled.  Some English scientists investigated this.  After making an examination of the geological strata in Palestine, they said, “We have found the occasion of the earthquake.  There is a geological fault running through the mountains of Lebanon.  It is particularly evident in the Mount of Olives.  There is a great shifting of strata; and some of these days there will undoubtedly be a greater earthquake in Palestine, as a result of which the Mount of Olives will be torn in two.”  We not only knew about that long ago, but we also know just what will make it break in two.  The blessed feet of our Saviour will again touch earth, and the moment He takes His stand on the Mount of Olives there will be a great earthquake.  The Mount of Olives will be torn asunder at the close of the Great Tribulation.  Then Israel will be delivered.

Let us now turn to the New Testament (Matt. 24:21), where we read of events that will take place before His second coming:

“For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.”

How manifestly He chose to use almost the identical language that the angel used in speaking to Daniel in order that we may understand that it refers to exactly the same event!

“And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect’s  sake those days shall be shortened.  Then if any man shall say unto you, Lo, here is Christ, or  there; believe it not.  For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great    signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect” (Matt. 24:22-24).

Men look for the return of the Lord, and all sorts of false theories are proclaimed.

“For as the lightning cometh out of the east, and shineth even unto the west; so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.  For wheresoever the carcase is, there will the eagles be gathered together” (Matt. 24:27,28).

The carcase will be Jerusalem, the apostate part of Israel found in the land of Palestine.  There the vultures, the armies of all nations, will come; and while things are in this condition, the Son of man will appear.

“Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken:  And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth  mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory.  And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and they shall gather together  his elect (the elect of Israel) from the four winds, from one end of heaven to the other” (Matt. 24:29-31).

The Preterists interpret our Lord as depicting the desolation of Palestine under Rome, but did the events here predicted follow the desolation?  The historical interpreters tell us that these events took place during the persecution of the Christians under the papacy for something like twelve and a half centuries.  When the persecution came to an end after the terrible Spanish Inquisition, did these events take place?  Any student of history knows the answer, which is an emphatic negative.

But let us suppose that everything in verse 29 could be spiritualized–the darkening of the sun and moon, an eclipse, the falling of the stars, a shower of meteorites, and the shaking of the powers of heaven; or suppose that the entire verse could refer to the subduing of a great imperial power.  What about verse 30?  This verse tells us that the return of the Son of man will be visible.  “Then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven…and they shall see the Son of man….”  While it is possible to spiritualize this event, making the return of Christ some great spiritual experience, like a revival, we believe that this verse is much more difficult to be twisted and adapted by those who do not want to accept the plain, literal meaning.  The simplest possible interpretation is to accept it just as it is.

Now turn to Luke’s account and notice a very important distinction there between the Great Tribulation and the sorrows of Palestine under the Romans.

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof  is nigh”  (Luke 21:20).

Here, unquestionably, our Lord predicted the destruction of Jerusalem under Titus.  This prophecy has been fulfilled with the strictest literality.

We can judge the future only by the past.  If prophecy has had only a spiritual fulfillment in the past, it will have only a spiritual fulfillment in the future.  But if prophecy has had a strictly literal fulfillment in the past, it is absolutely certain that it will have a strictly literal fulfillment in the future.

Here our Lord prophesied what will come to Jerusalem.  If you are familiar with the history of the fall of Jerusalem, you will know how definitely the events predicted came to pass.  We read, “Jerusalem compassed with armies,” and in accordance with this, three Roman armies besieged Jerusalem.

“Then know that the desolation thereof is nigh.  Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto” (Luke 21:20,21).

You remember that when Titus was to make his final onslaught, he first proclaimed an armistice and allowed anyone who desired to do so to leave the city.  He appointed Pella, a mountain city, as a place of refuge for them.  Everyone who believed in the Lord Jesus Christ and honored His name left the city.  There was not a Christian left in that siege.  Our Lord gave them instructions: “When ye shall see (this)…flee,” and they went to Pella for protection.

“For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.  But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days!  for there shall be great  distress in the land, and wrath upon this people.  And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and   shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”

Did this tribulation under Titus result in the deliverance of Israel?  No, it resulted in the scattering of Israel.  Israel was led captive of all nations.  Very well, what about the centuries since?

“Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”

Here is a long period during which Jerusalem, the land of Palestine, and the people of Israel are under gentile dominion.  That period is known as “the times of the Gentiles,” and it will run until its fulfillment.  Then what?  How will they know when they have come to the end of that period?

“And there shall be signs in the sun, and in the moon, and in the stars; an upon the earth distress of nations, with perplexity; the sea and the waves roaring…And then shall they see the Son of man coming in a cloud with power and great glory” (Luke 21:25,27).

So the Tribulation will come at the end of the times of the Gentiles and will close with the descent of the Lord from heaven.

What will characterize the time of the Tribulation?  It will be the day of Antichrist.  The Thessalonians were perplexed and troubled because of the sufferings through which they were passing, and they feared that already they were in the time of the Great Tribulation, which is called “the Day of the Lord’s Vengeance.”  Paul wrote in II Thessalonians 2:

“Now we beseech you, brethren, by the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, and by our gathering  together unto him, That ye be not soon shaken in mind, or be troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us (someone had evidently forged a letter from Paul telling them that  the Tribulation was already upon them) as that the day of Christ is at hand.  Let no man deceive  you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”

Somebody might say, “The Great Tribulation began when Gregory declared himself to be the head of all the churches of Christendom; therefore, it refers to the papal persecution.”  However, we have seen that the Great Tribulation will end with the deliverance of Israel and the visible return of our Lord to this earth, a return so literal that His feet will stand in that day on the Mount of Olives.  Surely this cannot refer to the papacy, “who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”  If this referred to the papacy, the pope would have to sit in the temple of God.  I do not believe that St. Peter’s Cathedral is the temple of God.  It is a temple of idolatry.  Nor do I believe that the Roman Church is the temple of God.  It is an apostate system.  But the temple of God is the temple frequently spoken of by the prophets as the temple yet to be rebuilt.  The Antichrist sits there and declares himself to be God.

“Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things?  And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time.  For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way” (II Thess. 2:5-7).

Some think this meant that the Roman Empire would be dissolved first.  Paul was talking about something here that every Christian ought to know, because the Bible reveals it.  What hinders full development of evil in the world?  The Spirit of God restrains now.  The Spirit of God is here in the Church of God, restraining the full development of evil.  Some day the Church will be gone, and the Spirit of God will no longer be active on earth as a divine Person in the Church of God.

“And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his  mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders” (II Thess. 2:8,9).

These signs and lying wonders arre pictured in Revelation 13.

What will be the outcome when the Tribulation comes upon the earth?  A large part of Revelation evidently has to do with the Great Tribulation, ending with the personal appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ.  It fits so perfectly with what we read of the Great Tribulation that I am sure it is the same time.  Not all of Israel are really Israel.  It must be regenerated Israel in that day to be really Israel and to be so counted, just as today the Israel of God are those who are regenerated.  In the first part of Revelation 7 you have the remnant of Israel.

“And after these things I saw four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, holding the four winds of the earth, that the wind should not blow on the earth, nor on the sea, nor on any tree.  And I saw another angel ascending from the east, having the seal of the living God: and he   cried with a loud voice to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and the sea, Saying, Hurt not the earth, neither the sea, nor the trees, till we have sealed the servants of God in their foreheads (the four angels who are seen sealing the servants of our God before the Great  Tribulation begins).  And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.”

In the fourteenth chapter of Revelation the Saviour actually appears, and we find that the 144,000, delivered out of the Tribulation, are waiting to receive Him.  They form what we might call a royal bodyguard in the coming day when He will establish His glorious millennial kingdom.  Israel is sealed by God at the beginning of the Tribulation (chap. 7).  Israel is preserved for the kingdom at the end of the Tribulation (chap. 14).

The 144,000 are out of every tribe of Israel.  No one can possibly be misled about this.  Look at the latter part of chapter 7.  I do not know whether or not the number 144,000 can be taken literally.

“After this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands” (v. 9).

“And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in white robes?  and whence came they?  And I (John) said unto him, Sir, thou knowest.  And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb” (vv. 13,14).

“And have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.”  How are people to be saved in the Tribulation day?  Just exactly as they are saved today–through the same precious blood of Christ.  Every soul saved in any dispensation, from the day of Abel down to the end of the Millennium, owes all of his blessing to the precious, atoning blood of the Son of God.

“Therefore are they before the throne of God, and serve him day and night in his temple: and   he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.  They shall hunger no more, neither thirst any more; neither shall the sun light on them, nor any heat.  For the Lamb which is in the midst  of the throne shall feed them, and shall lead them unto living fountains of waters: and God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes” (vv. 15-17).

The company saved in the Tribulation will remain on earth to share in the millennial kingdom.  In Isaiah 49:8 we have a prophecy that refers to this very same company:

“Thus saith the Lord, In an acceptable time have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages; That thou mayest say to the prisoners, Go forth; to them that are in darkness, Shew yourselves.  They shall feed in the ways, and their pastures shall be in all high places.  They shall not hunger nor thirst; neither shall the heat nor sun smite them: for he that hath mercy on them shall lead them, even by the springs of water shall he guide them.  And I will make all my mountains a way, and my highways shall be exalted.  Behold, these shall come from far: and, lo, these from the north and from the west; and these from the land of  Sinim (the ancient name for China).”

There will be a vast throng of Gentiles to whom the light will come in those dark days of the Tribulation to prepare them for the glorious kingdom of the Lord Jesus Christ.

So I think that the Scriptures looked at, and there are many more that could have been added, are sufficient surely to show us that the Great Tribulation did not take place when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans, nor did it take place under either pagan or papal Rome.  It will occur immediately before the appearing of the Lord Jesus Christ to establish His glorious kingdom in this world.  It will not take place before the Church has gone to heaven.  Five proofs of this are listed below:

l.  The Tribulation cannot take place before the Lamb opens the book with seven seals.  When the seals are broken, troubles begin to come (Rev. 5).
2.  The Lamb does not receive the seven-sealed book from the hand of the Father until the crowned saints are seen in heaven.  In Revelation 4 and 5 we have the twenty-four elders seated about the throne wearing crowns of gold upon their heads.
3.  No saints will be crowned in heaven until the Apostle Paul receives his crown.  “Henceforth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, the righteous judge, shall give me at that day: and not to me only, but unto all them also that love his appearing” (II Tim. 4:8).
4.  The Apostle Paul and other saints with him will not receive their crowns until the Judgment Seat of Christ.  It is referred to as “that day.”
5.  The Judgment Seat of Christ is immediately after the Rapture of the Church.  Jesus says, “Behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man according as his work shall be.”

The conclusion, therefore, is that there will be no Great Tribulation before the Church has gone to be with the Lord.  The Rapture must take place before the time of the Great Tribulation can begin here on the earth.

Reprinted from The Lamp of Prophecy, by H.A. Ironside, by permission of Zondervan Publishing House, Grand Rapids, Michigan

2 Comments »

  1. PRETRIB RAPTURE DISHONESTY

    by Dave MacPherson

    When I began my research in 1970 into the exact beginnings of the pretribulation rapture belief still held by many evangelicals, I assumed that the rapture debate involved only “godly scholars with honest differences.” The paper you are now reading reveals why I gave up that assumption many years ago. With this introduction-of-sorts in mind, let’s take a long look at the pervasive dishonesty throughout the history of the 179-year-old pretrib rapture theory:

    Mid-1820’s – German scholar Max Weremchuk’s work “John Nelson Darby” (1992) included what Benjamin Newton revealed about John Darby in the mid-1820’s during his pre-Brethren days as an Anglican clergyman:
    “J. N. Darby was a very subtle man. He had been a lawyer, or at least educated for the law. Once he wanted his Archbishop to pursue a certain course, when he (J.N.D.) was a curate in his diocese. He wrote a letter, therefore, saying he had been educated for the law, knew what the legal course would properly be; and then having written that clearly, he mystified the remainder of the letter both in word and in handwriting, and ended up by saying: You see, my Lord, such being the legal aspect of the case it would unquestionably be the best course for you to pursue, etc. And the Archbishop couldn’t make out the legal part, but rested on Darby’s word and did as he advised. Darby afterwards laughed over it, and indeed he showed a copy of the letter to Tregelles. This is not mentioned in the Archbishop’s biography, but in it is the fact that he spoke of Darby as ‘the most subtle man in my diocese.’”
    This reminds me of an 1834 letter by Darby which spoke of the “Lord’s coming.” Darby added, concerning this coming, that “the thoughts are new” and that during any teaching of it “it would not be well to have it so clear.” Darby’s deviousness here was his usage of a centuries-old term – “Lord’s coming” – to cover up his desire to sneak the new pretrib idea into existing posttrib groups in very low-profile ways!
    1830 – In the spring of 1830 a young Scottish lassie, Margaret Macdonald, came up with the novel notion of a catching up [rapture] of Spirit-filled “church” members before Antichrist’s “trial” [tribulation] of non-Spirit-filled “church” members – the first instance I’ve found of clear “pretrib” teaching (which was part of a partial rapture scheme). In Sep. 1830 “The Morning Watch” (a journal produced by London preacher Edward Irving and his “Irvingite” followers, some of whom had visited Margaret a few weeks earlier) began repeating her original thoughts and even her wording but gave her no credit – the first plagiarism I’ve found in pretrib history. Darby was still defending posttrib in Dec. 1830.
    Pretrib promoters have long known the significance of her main point: a rapture of “church” members BEFORE the revealing of Antichrist. Which is why John Walvoord quoted nothing in her revelation, why Thomas Ice habitually skips over her main point but quotes lines BEFORE and AFTER it, and why Hal Lindsey muddies up her main point so he can (falsely) assert that she was NOT a pretribber! (Google “X-Raying Margaret” for info about her.)
    NOTE: The development of the 1800’s is thoroughly documented in my book “The Rapture Plot.” You’ll learn that Darby wasn’t original on any chief aspect of dispensationalism (but plagiarized the Irvingites); that pretrib was initially based on only OT and NT symbols and not clear Scripture; that the symbols included the Jewish feasts, the two witnesses, and the man child – symbols adopted by Darby during most of his career; that Darby’s later reminiscences exaggerated his earliest pretrib development, and that today’s defenders such as Thomas Ice have further overstated what Darby overstated; that Irvingism didn’t need later reminiscences to “clarify” its own early pretrib development; that ancient hymns and even the writings of the Reformers were subtly revised to make it appear they had taught pretrib; and that after Darby’s death a clever revisionist quietly made many changes in early Irvingite and Brethren documents in order to steal credit for pretrib away from the Irvingites (and their female inspiration!) and give it dishonestly to Darby! (Before continuing, Google the “Powered by Christ Ministries” site and read “America’s Pretrib Rapture Traffickers” – a sample of the current exciting internetism!)
    1920 – Charles Trumbull’s book “The Life Story of C. I. Scofield” told only the dispensationally-correct side of his life. Two recent books, Joseph Canfield’s “The Incredible Scofield and His Book” (1988) and David Lutzweiler’s “DispenSinsationalism: C. I. Scofield’s Life and Errors” (2006), reveal the other side including his being jailed as a forger, dishonestly giving himself a non-conferred “D.D.” etc. etc.!
    1967 – Brethren scholar Harold Rowdon’s “The Origins of the Brethren” quoted Darby associate Lord Congleton who was “disgusted with…the falseness” of Darby’s accounts of things. Rowdon also quoted historian William Neatby who said that others felt that “the time-honoured method of single combat” was as good as anything “to elicit the truth” from Darby. (In other words, knock it out of him!)
    1972 – Tim LaHaye’s “The Beginning of the End” (1972) plagiarized Hal Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970).
    1976 – Charles Ryrie”s “The Living End” (1976) plagiarized Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970) and “There’s A New World Coming” (1973).
    1976 – After John Walvoord’s “The Blessed Hope and the Tribulation” (1976) brutally twisted Robert Gundry’s “The Church and the Tribulation” (1973), Gundry composed and circulated a 35-page open letter to Walvoord which repeatedly charged the Dallas Seminary president with “misrepresentation,” “misrepresentations” (and variations)!
    1981 – “The Fundamentalist Phenomenon” (1981) by Jerry Falwell, Ed Dobson, and Ed Hindson heavily plagiarized George Dollar’s 1973 book “A History of Fundamentalism in America.”
    1984 – After a prof at Southeastern College of the Assemblies of God in Florida told me that the No. 2 man at the AG world headquarters in Missouri – Joseph Flower – had the label of posttrib, my wife and I had two hour-long chats with him. He verified what I had been told. But we were dumbstruck when he told us that although AG ministers are required to promote pretrib, privately they can believe any other rapture view! Flower said that his father, an AG co-founder, was also posttrib. We also learned while in Springfield that when the AG’s were organized in 1914, the initial group was divided between posttribs and pretribs – but that the pretribs shouted louder which resulted in that denomination officially adopting pretrib! (For details on this and other pretrib double-mindedness, Google “Pretrib Hypocrisy.”)
    1989 – Since 1989 Thomas Ice has referred to the “Mac-theory” (his reference to my research), giving the impression there’s no solid evidence that Macdonald was the real pretrib originator. But Ice carefully conceals the fact that no eminent church historian of the 1800’s – whether Plymouth Brethren or Irvingite – credited Darby with pretrib. Instead, they uniformly credited leading Irvingite sources, all of which upheld the Scottish lassie’s contribution! Moreover, I’m hardly the only modern scholar seeing significance in Irvingism’s territory. Others in recent years who have noted it, but who haven’t mined it as deeply as I have, include Fuller, Ladd, Bass, Rowdon, Sandeen, and Gundry.
    1989 – Greg Bahnsen and Kenneth Gentry produced evidence in 1989 that Lindsey’s book “The Road to Holocaust” (1989) plagiarized “Dominion Theology” (1988) by H. Wayne House and Thomas Ice.
    1990 – David Jeremiah’s and C. C. Carlson’s “Escape the Coming Night” (1990) massively plagiarized Lindsey’s 1973 book “There’s A New World Coming.” (For more info, type in “Thieves’ Marketing” on MSN or Google.)
    1991 – Paul Lee Tan’s “A Pictorial Guide to Bible Prophecy” (1991) plagiarized large amounts of Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970).
    1991 – Militant Darby defender R. A. Huebner claimed in 1991 to have found new evidence that Darby was pretrib as early as 1827 – three years before Macdonald. Halfway through his book Huebner suddenly admitted that his evidence could refer to something completely un-rapturesque. Even though Thomas Ice admitted to me that he knew that Huebner had “blown” his so-called evidence, prevaricator Ice continues to tell the world that Huebner has “positive evidence” that Darby was pretrib in 1827! Ice also conceals the fact that Darby, in his own 1827 paper, was looking for only “the restitution of all things” and “the times of refreshing” (Acts 3:19,21) – which Scofield doesn’t see fulfilled until AFTER a future tribulation!
    1992 – Tim LaHaye’s “No Fear of the Storm” (1992) plagiarized Walvoord’s “The Blessed Hope and the Tribulation” (1976).
    1992 – This was when the Los Angeles Times revealed that “The Magog Factor” (1992) by Hal Lindsey and Chuck Missler was a monstrous plagiarism of Prof. Edwin Yamauchi’s scholarly 1982 work “Foes from the Northern Frontier.” Four months after this exposure, Lindsey and Missler stated they had stopped publishing and promoting their book. But in 1996 Dr. Yamauchi learned that the dishonest duo had issued a 1995 book called “The Magog Invasion” which still had a substantial amount of the same plagiarism! (If Lindsey and Missler ever need hernia operations, I predict that the doctors will tell them not to lift anything for a long time!)
    1994 – In 1996 it was revealed that Lindsey’s “Planet Earth – 2000 A.D. (1994) had an embarrassing amount of plagiarism of a Texe Marrs book titled “Mystery Mark of the New Age” (1988).
    1995 – My book “The Rapture Plot” reveals the dishonesty in Darby’s reprinted works. It’s often hard to tell who wrote the footnotes and when. It’s easy to believe that the notes, and also unsigned phrases inside brackets within the text, were a devious attempt by someone (Darby? his editor?) to portray a Darby far more developed in pretrib thinking than he actually had been at the time. I found that some of the “additives” had been taken from Darby’s much later works, when he was more developed, and placed next to or inside his earliest works! One footnote by Darby’s editor, attached to Darby’s 1830 paper, actually stated that “it was not worth while either suppressing or changing” anything in this work! If his editor wasn’t open to such dishonesty, how can we explain such a statement?
    Post-1995 – Thomas Ice’s article “Inventor of False Pre-Trib Rapture History” states that my book “The Rapture Plot” is “only one of the latest in a series of revisions of his original discourse….” And David Reagan in his article “The Origin of the Concept of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture” repeats Ice’s falsehood by claiming that I have republished my first book “over the years under several different titles.”
    Although my book repeats a bit of the Macdonald origin of pretrib (for new readers), all of my books are packed with new material not found in my other works. For some clarification, “The Incredible Cover-Up” has photos of pertinent places in Ireland, Scotland, and England not found in my later books plus several chapters dealing with theological arguments; “The Great Rapture Hoax” quotes scholars throughout the Church Age, covers Scofield’s hidden side, a section on Powerscourt, the 1980 election, the Jupiter Effect, Gundry’s change, and more theological arguments; “The Rapture Plot” reveals for the first time the Great Evangelical Revisionism/Robbery and includes appendices on miscopying, plagiarism, etc.; and “The Three R’s” shows hypocritical evangelicals employing occultic beliefs they say they have long opposed!
    So Thomas Ice etc. are twisting truth when they claim I am only a revisionist. Do they really think that my publishers DON’T know what I’ve previously written?
    Re arguments, Google “Pretrib Rapture – Hidden Facts” and also obtain “The End Times Passover” and “Why Christians Will Suffer ‘Great Tribulation’ ” (AuthorHouse, 2006) by media personality Joe Ortiz.
    1997 – For years Harvest House Publishers has owned and been republishing Lindsey’s book “There’s A New World Coming.” During the same time Lindsey has been peddling his reportedly “new” book “Apocalyse Code” (1997), much of which is word-for-word the same as the Harvest House book – and there’s no notice of “simultaneous publishing” in either book! Talk about pretrib greed!
    1997 – This is the year I discovered that more than 50 pages of Dallas Seminary professor Merrill Unger’s book “Beyond the Crystal Ball” (Moody Press, 1973) constituted a colossal plagiarism of Lindsey’s “The Late Great Planet Earth” (1970). After Lindsey’s book came out, Unger had complained that Lindsey’s book had plagiarized his classroom lecture notes. It was evident that Unger felt that he too should cash in on his own lectures! (The detailed account of this Dallas Seminary dishonesty is revealed in my 1998 book “The Three R’s.”)
    1998 – Tim LaHaye’s “Understanding the Last Days” (1998) plagiarized Lindsey’s “There’s A New World Coming” (1973).
    1999 – More than 200 pages (out of 396 pages) in Lindsey’s 1999 book “Vanished Into Thin Air” are virtually carbon copies of pages in his 1983 book “The Rapture” – with no “updated” or “revised” notice included! Lindsey has done the same nervy thing with several of his books, something that has allowed him to live in million-dollar-plus homes and drive cars like Ferraris! (See my Google articles “Deceiving and Being Deceived” and “Thieves’ Marketing” for further evidence of this notably pretrib vice.)
    2000 – A Jack Van Impe article “The Moment After” (2000) plagiarized Grant Jeffrey’s book “Final Warning” (1995).
    2001 – Since 2001 my web article “Walvoord’s Posttrib ‘Varieties’ – Plus” has been exposing his devious muddying up of posttrib waters. In some of his books he invented four “distinct” and “contradictory” posttrib divisions, claiming that they are either “classic” or “semiclassic” or “futurist” or “dispensational” – distinctions that disappear when analyzed! His “futurist” group holds to a literal future tribulation and a literal millennium but doesn’t embrace “any day” imminency. But his “dispensational” group has the same non-imminency! Moreover, tribulational futurism is found in every group except the first one, and he somehow admitted that a literal millennium is in all four groups! On the other hand, it’s the pretribs who consistently disagree with each other over their chief points and subpoints – but somehow end up agreeing that there will be a pretrib rapture! (See my chapter “A House Divided” in my book “The Incredible Cover-Up.”)
    2001 – Since my “Deceiving and Being Deceived” web item which exposed the claims for Pseudo-Ephraem” and “Morgan Edwards” as teachers of pretrib, there has been a piranha-like frenzy on the part of pretrib bodyguards and their duped groupies to “discover” almost anything before 1830 walking upright on two legs that seemed to have at least a remote hint of pretrib! (An exemplary poster boy for such pretrib practice is Grant Jeffrey. To get your money’s worth, Google “Wily Jeffrey.”)

    FINALLY: Don’t take my word for any of the above. Read my 300-page book “The Rapture Plot” which has a jillion more documented details on the long-hidden but now-revealed history of the dishonest, 179-year-old, fringe-British-invented, American-merchandised-until-the-real-bad-stuff-happens pretribulation rapture fad. If this book of mine doesn’t “move” you, I will personally refund what you paid for it!

    Comment by Ned — March 29, 2009 @ 4:40 am

  2. Ned, thank you for presenting us with another view. God bless you, Doylene

    Comment by dtbrents — April 3, 2009 @ 2:24 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.